Under Scrutiny - The News (Lagos) - 31 August 1999
Tuesday, August 31st, 1999The National Fertilizer Company of Nigeria, NAFCON and the Federal Superphosphate Fertilizer Company, FSFC, come under scrutiny as the Obasanjo administration searches for food security.
Last week, the Minister of Industry Dr. Iyorchia Ayu, constituted two judicial commissions of enquiry to look into the affairs of the National Fertilizer Company of Nigeria NAFCON, Onne, in Rivers State and the Federal Superphosphate Fertilizer Company (FSFC), Kaduna. But farmers and agricultural science experts are highly sceptical of the possibility of opening the can of worms firmly guarded by the two companies in the last five to six years. “Perhaps, the panel set up by the minister is a right step to expose the huge fraud that is rocking the two parastatals. But I doubt if the panels will be able to open the scam. I doubt it”, a senior officer in the Ministry of Industry told TheNEWSBusiness in Abuja last week.
Addressing journalists in Abuja, Ayu, whose ministry supervises the parastatals said that the ministry has named acting management teams for the fertilizer companies and panels to look into the affairs of both, adding that, the panels would be inaugurated by President Olusegun Obasanjo “very soon”.
He named retired Justice Mustapha Akanbi and Justice Michael Ekundayo as chairmen of the panels for NAFCON and FSFC respectively. Mrs. Fabiya Amakri and Mr. O.N. Agulu were appointed as acting managing directors for the two parastatals. They replace Messrs S.U Essien and Ibrahim Usman of NAFCON and FSFC respectively.
Informing journalists that both companies were in a “pathetic and unsatisfactory” state, the Minister said that “the condition in which we found the two companies were such that in respect of NAFCON, it was saddled with a huge debt of over N10 billion while the FSFC Kaduna had a debt of over N2 billion,” adding that the sulphuric acid plant of FSFC had been dismantled”.
An agricultural science expert in the Ministry of Agriculture, Abuja told this magazine that the probe panels and the newly appointed acting chief executives would be “doing a great service to this nation and helping to bring the agricultural policy back to its glory, if they take stock of what has happened in the past five years and see where we went wrong. The 1991 Fertilizer policy which was enacted on 14 May 1991 could be described as one of the worst things that had happened to the fertilizer procurement and distribution programme”.
This magazine gathered that the policy has created loopholes which local producers exploited to their full advantage and to the detriment of Nigeria and farmers. Indeed, findings reveal that the policy gave NAFCON, which was made “the leader of the local producers,” some undeserved monopoly in the procurement and distribution of all local fertilizers. “They were mandated to procure all locally produced fertilizers from themselves and other privately owned blenders, distribute, transport and monitor such fertilizers,” another source in the Ministry of Industry said.
The policy, sources added, empowered NAFCON to do whatever it wanted and pass whatever bills it “unilaterally” prepared to the Federal Ministry of Finance which paid them directly. TheNEWSBusiness gathered that the height of this trend was reached in 1996 when NAFCON submitted its bills to the Ministry of Finance and got paid without a contract at all. Attempts to retrieve the so-called contract document failed when the then Honourable Minister of Agriculture and Natural Resources, Alhaji Muhammadu A. Gambo directed the officials that wrongly signed it to do so. “This is how the fertilizer sector broke down and was cancelled in November 1996 by the late General Sani Abacha’s regime,” an Industry ministry source told this magazine.
Since the government stopped the procurement of fertilizer through importation owing to “NAFCON’s fraudulent practices,” The News Business findings reveal that the decision has greatly affected the estimates of fertilizer requirements as the so-called local producers and blenders could not meet the federal government’s supply target.
For example, the Agricultural Project Monitoring Unit (APMU), of the Federal Department of Agriculture projected a total requirement of 2,310,214 metric tonnes from 1991 rising to 6,577,658 metric tonnes in 1995. However, a recent agricultural ministry study on fertilizer privatization estimated a projected demand of 1,035,000 metric tonnes and a projected supply of 1,179,000 metric tonnes through domestic and import supply to satisfy the demand by the farmers.
However, a study by the agriculture ministry projected the supply of 1,179,000 metric tones for the 1996 season, immediately after the 1991 fertilizer policy was cancelled, it was identified that NAFCON supplied 202,000 metric tonnes of urea and 200,000 metric tonnes of NPK 15:15:15. While blenders supplied 204,000 metric tones of DAP, 132,000 metric tonnes of MOP and 134,000 metric tonnes of lirea. The importers took delivery of 33,000 metric tonnes of SSP and 130,000 metric tonnes of NPK brand of fertilizer in spite of the Federal Government’s policy not to import fertilizer.
But then, findings by agriculture ministry revealed that the claims of NAFCON and local blenders to local production of fertilizer is a ruse. “The so-called local manufacturers of fertilizer has been a ruse all along. They were exposed when government stopped the importation of fertilizers. NAFCON and the so-called local blenders rely on 90 per cent of imported raw materials to produce urea,” a source in the agriculture ministry added.
This magazine further learnt that even when the local blenders or manufacturers produce fertilizer, they did not have adequate facilities for quality control. “Judging from the level of their output in the past six years, the local producers do not seem to have the capacity and technical know-how to produce more than 500,000 metric tonnes of fertilizer in a year and this is only slightly over one third of the total quantity required by the farmers in the country,” an expert in the agriculture ministry said